My official position is that you can't really "improve" Go. There might be something in there worth salvaging, but you can't just tweak some rules and make Go better. That's not because Go is so great
, but because tweaking rules on an existing system like that tends to create vastly horrible results.
With that said, it might
be an interesting intellectual exercise to sort of try to graft on the Clockwork Game Design
concepts onto Go and see what you get.
Every day I throw down failed game design ideas. Today I thought I'd share one with you guys just to get a little game design conversation going. (With the election and everything, things have been a little slow on that front recently.)
Here's as far as I got, just to get you guys started.
Some basic ideas for it:
- 13x13 board, as a starting place. Would scale up or down as necessary. Maybe the board shouldn't even be square, not sure.
- Fog of war. Basically my idea was that you get a vision range of 2, but this doesn't actually make any sense in practice for a few reasons. One is that you shouldn't be able to place pieces on the perimeter (random), let alone across the board in some random fogged spot. And the second is that at some point (possibly 10-12 moves in) you're going to just see the whole board - bye bye, hidden information. There may be solutions to these problems, but I don't know. (I'll come back to this at the end.)
- At least 1 piece down already, probably more like 3-4 in a random, non-mirrored configuration (this is to avoid guessing what the opponent is doing in the fog).
- Grey pieces are down in a mirrored configuration. Grey pieces turn your color when you put a piece next to them. Or maybe they do something different?
A few thoughts I had as I was giving up on this:
- Maybe this could be single player somehow? Like having to do with the grey pieces? Probably not.
Back to the fog of war and the problems with it: funny thing about this is, it doesn't really work, and one of the reasons it doesn't work is the "I can just lay down pieces willy-nilly whereever I want with no restrictions" element of Go to begin with.
Anyway, like I said, I make these kinds of failed little concepts all the time and since things have been slow around these parts recently, I thought I'd share this one totally non-working, bad idea with you.
How would you apply the Clockwork Game Design design methodology to Go? Just to review, here are some of the demands:
- No memorized openings/closings
- Some source of hidden information
- The game should be no longer than it needs to be (Go's pretty long)
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
What does it mean when something is a "classic"? I think there's actually a huge problem here that needs to be explored. New work is created using new cultural and scientific understandings, and it's universally better in almost every case. We need to understand and appreciate this fact, and stop glorifying things just because they're old.
In this episode, you'll also hear me talk about classic games like Go and Chess, as well as talk about a better distinction between art and entertainment. Enjoy, and let me know what you think below.
Thanks for listening! Support the show here.
Haven't listened to the podcast before? Start from the beginning here! Subscribe via RSS here!